1.
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Lane, MM, Gamage, E, Travica, N, Dissanayaka, T, Ashtree, DN, Gauci, S, Lotfaliany, M, O'Neil, A, Jacka, FN, Marx, W
Nutrients. 2022;14(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor dietary quality is well established as a potentially modifiable risk factor for mental disorders. The NOVA food classification system was recently developed to enable the categorisation of food items based on distinctive levels of processing. The aim of this study was to synthesise and provide quantitative analyses of the most up-to-date evidence assessing associations between consumption of ultra-processed food, as defined by the NOVA food classification system, and mental disorders. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies with a total of 385,541 participants. The studies were 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospectively designed studies. Results show that ultra-processed food consumption is bidirectionally associated with adverse mental health. In fact, greater intake of ultra-processed food was associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together as well as separately. Authors conclude that further prospective and experimental studies are required to better determine directionality and causality and ensure that global preventative and treatment strategies are efficacious and appropriate.
Abstract
Since previous meta-analyses, which were limited only to depression and by a small number of studies available for inclusion at the time of publication, several additional studies have been published assessing the link between ultra-processed food consumption and depression as well as other mental disorders. We aimed to build on previously conducted reviews to synthesise and meta-analyse the contemporary evidence base and clarify the associations between the consumption of ultra-processed food and mental disorders. A total of 17 observational studies were included (n = 385,541); 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospective. Greater ultra-processed food consumption was cross-sectionally associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together (common mental disorder symptoms odds ratio: 1.53, 95%CI 1.43 to 1.63) as well as separately (depressive symptoms odds ratio: 1.44, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.82; and, anxiety symptoms odds ratio: 1.48, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.59). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies demonstrated that greater ultra-processed food intake was associated with increased risk of subsequent depression (hazard ratio: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.28). While we found evidence for associations between ultra-processed food consumption and adverse mental health, further rigorously designed prospective and experimental studies are needed to better understand causal pathways.
2.
Randomized controlled trial comparing smartphone assisted versus traditional guided self-help for adults with binge eating.
Hildebrandt, T, Michaelides, A, Mackinnon, D, Greif, R, DeBar, L, Sysko, R
The International journal of eating disorders. 2017;50(11):1313-1322
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Mobile technology offers the potential for greater accessibility to patients, and a reduced treatment burden, which could increase adherence to self-help treatments. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to test the efficacy of a smartphone app – Noom Monitor - compared to traditional cognitive behaviour therapy in the management of binge eating episodes. The study recruited 66 adults who were randomized into two groups: cognitive-behaviour therapy through self-guided help or cognitive-behaviour therapy through self-guided help using Noom Monitor. Results show that patients receiving cognitive-behaviour therapy through self-guided help using Noom Monitor experienced a greater reduction in objective bulimic episodes and purging, and an increase in weekly meal and snack adherence. Authors conclude that smartphone apps can improve initial outcomes of cognitive-behaviour therapy through self-guided help and may offer a useful way to improve participant adherence among those who stay engaged in the treatment.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Guided self-help treatments based on cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT-GSH) are efficacious for binge eating. With limited availability of CBT-GSH in the community, mobile technology offers a means to increase use of these interventions. The purpose of this study was to test the initial efficacy of Noom Monitor, a smartphone application designed to facilitate CBT-GSH (CBT-GSH + Noom), on study retention, adherence, and eating disorder symptoms compared to traditional CBT-GSH. METHOD Sixty-six men and women with DSM-5 binge-eating disorder (BED) or bulimia nervosa (BN) were randomized to receive eight sessions of CBT-GSH + Noom (n = 33) or CBT-GSH (n = 33) over 12 weeks. Primary symptom outcomes were eating disorder examination objective bulimic episodes (OBEs), subjective bulimic episodes (SBEs), and compensatory behaviors. Assessments were collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 weeks. Behavioral outcomes were modeled using zero-inflated negative-binomial latent growth curve models with intent-to-treat. RESULTS There was a significant effect of treatment on change in OBEs (β = -0.84, 95% CI = -1.49, -0.19) favoring CBT-GSH + Noom. Remission rates were not statistically different between treatments for OBEs (βlogit = -0.73, 95% CI = -1.86, 3.27; CBT-GSH-Noom = 17/27, 63.0% vs. CBT-GSH 11/27, 40.7%, NNT = 4.5), but CBT-GSH-Noom participants reported greater meal and snack adherence and regular meal adherence mediated treatment effects on OBEs. The treatments did not differ at the 6-month follow-up. DISCUSSION Smartphone applications for the treatment binge eating appear to have advantages for adherence, a critical component of treatment dissemination.
3.
Binge-eating disorder and the outcome of bariatric surgery in a prospective, observational study: Two-year results.
Chao, AM, Wadden, TA, Faulconbridge, LF, Sarwer, DB, Webb, VL, Shaw, JA, Thomas, JG, Hopkins, CM, Bakizada, ZM, Alamuddin, N, et al
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2016;24(11):2327-2333
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Binge eating disorder is characterised by the consumption of an objectively large amount of food in a discrete period of time (i.e. 2hrs) with an accompanying loss of control over eating. This study is a follow-up study that examined weight loss over an average of 24 months post bariatric surgery (as most studies are based on a shorter duration i.e. less than 12 months) in 59 patients. Another aim of the study was whether bariatric surgery had any effects on the remission or precipitation of binge eating. Results indicate that patients with a preoperative diagnosis of binge-eating disorder lost significantly less weight 2 years after surgery than those individuals who were free from binge-eating prior surgery. However, those with a diagnosis of binge-eating disorder who received lifestyle modifications lost significantly less than those who had bariatric surgery. Authors conclude that bariatric-surgery may be a useful long-term weight loss strategy for patients with eating disorders. However, they also recommend that these patients may benefit from additional counselling and behavioural support, such as cognitive behaviour therapy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A previous study reported that preoperative binge-eating disorder (BED) did not attenuate weight loss at 12 months after bariatric surgery. This report extends the authors' prior study by examining weight loss at 24 months. METHODS A modified intention-to-treat population was used to compare 24-month changes in weight among 59 participants treated with bariatric surgery, determined preoperatively to be free of a current eating disorder, with changes in 33 surgically treated participants with BED. Changes were also compared with 49 individuals with obesity and BED who sought lifestyle modification for weight loss. Analyses included all available data points and were adjusted for covariates. RESULTS At month 24, surgically treated patients with BED preoperatively lost 18.6% of initial weight, compared with 23.9% for those without BED (P = 0.049). (Mean losses at month 12 had been 21.5% and 24.2%, respectively; P = 0.23.) Participants with BED who received lifestyle modification lost 5.6% at 24 months, significantly less than both groups of surgically treated patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that preoperative BED attenuates long-term weight loss after bariatric surgery. We recommend that patients with this condition, as well as other eating disturbances, receive adjunctive behavioral support, the timing of which remains to be determined.